CBS' Watson: A Conflicted Journey Through Medicine and Mystery
CBS has recently introduced its latest drama series, Watson, which aims to provide a fresh take on the beloved character originally created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. However, the show appears to be struggling to find its footing, presenting viewers with a mix of familiar tropes and a somewhat scattered narrative. Set against the backdrop of Pittsburgh, Watson stars Morris Chestnut as John Watson, who steps into the spotlight following the death of his mentor and friend, Sherlock Holmes.
At first glance, Watson might evoke memories of other recent medical dramas like Fox’s Doc or CBS’ own The Pitt. Both series feature protagonists grappling with personal loss while navigating their professional lives. Yet, Watson distinguishes itself with an unusual premise that includes elements of mystery and intrigue, reminiscent of the iconic House, where a brilliant but eccentric doctor solves medical puzzles with a team of younger protégés.
Despite its intriguing setup, Watson has faced criticism for its lack of clarity regarding its identity. The show seems to oscillate between being a medical drama, a thriller, and a character-driven narrative, without fully committing to any one direction. The early episodes reveal a series grappling with its tone and purpose, leaving viewers uncertain about the journey ahead.
The plot kicks off with Watson returning to medicine after the presumed death of Holmes, opening a clinic focused on genetics and rare diseases. However, his past continues to haunt him, particularly the shadowy figure of Moriarty, who is revealed to be alive and actively working against Watson. This twist raises questions about the show’s direction, as the character of Moriarty is portrayed in a manner that feels disconnected from the overall tone of the series.
As for the supporting cast, they bring a mix of personalities to Watson’s team, but their development often feels superficial. Characters like the athletic Adam and introverted Stephens, both played by Peter Mark Kendall, lack distinctiveness, while Ingrid, a manipulative figure played by Eve Harlow, is softened too quickly for dramatic effect. Sasha, portrayed by Inga Schlingmann, adds a bit of sweetness, but her storyline is introduced and then quickly abandoned.
Watson himself is a complex character, but the series struggles to define him beyond his heroic actions. The show often depicts his choices as noble, even when they cross ethical boundaries, such as administering a questionable treatment to a patient. This portrayal raises concerns about the moral implications of his actions, as the narrative seems to prioritize Watson’s image as a savior over a deeper exploration of his character.
The medical mysteries presented in Watson can be engaging, with some plotlines offering a touch of humor, such as a Revolutionary War reenactor who believes he is a historical figure after a head injury. However, the show often shifts focus from these intriguing cases to Watson’s moral crusades, which can detract from the overall narrative flow.
Ultimately, Watson is a series that aspires to blend elements of drama, mystery, and social commentary, but it often falters in execution. The show aims to provide escapism through its portrayal of a smart, noble protagonist, yet it struggles to create a world that feels consistently captivating. As it stands, Watson is an uneven viewing experience, leaving audiences hoping for a clearer path as the series progresses. With its potential for growth and development, viewers will be watching closely to see if Watson can find its voice and deliver a more cohesive narrative in the episodes to come.